MANAGING OF ECONOMIC SCIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE

Abstract

Problems of development and the role of science in society and the economy are the result of long delays of unsparing criticism, stumbling in the development of an authentic theory, conceptual immersion in the routine approach and pragmatism, and mental self-confidence and love for yourself. This led to the deformation of scientific research and the degradation of science, which is adapted to the requirements of the voluntary political centers. So today we pay tribute to improvisation, for imitation, for noninvention. The economics of widely-flowered false radicalisms critical to the social, economic, and social reality, but also with a very refined abstracting own inadequacy to highly qualified and visokoekspertski tackle the challenges of the times. Creative there is nothing (unless the futility of not reinterpreted as a contribution), and if it, here and there, there, it's a handful of rational with a huge amount of overburden in otherwise shallow research. Power "science" only manifests if "ran out" individual right "hereditary." What followed was a trampling of labeling and without mercy at the cost of burial. Science and its representatives are, therefore, only then powerful. Macroeconomics is the most dynamic discipline of today (in addition to the financial, monetary, fiscal and exchange management), which includes elements of behavioral economics, such as expectations, credibility and information. Information, as a rule, uplivišu to expectations and credibility just as well as anti-inflation reputation of the government determines the credibility of the stabilization, which "feed" the development trust and non-inflationary expectations. In this chain, all gain experience and learn all the "mistakes and attempt" (line learning - hysteresis).