IMMIGRATION AND LIBERTARIANISM: OPEN BORDERS VERSUS DIRECTIONALISM

J. C. Lester

Abstract


To explain the correct libertarian approach to immigration, a thought-experiment posits a minimal-state libertarian UK and then the introduction of several relevant anti-libertarian policies with their increasingly disastrous effects. It is argued that the reverse of these imagined policies, as far as is politically possible, must be the correct way forward. This framing is intended to counter the tendency for many articles to misapply libertarian principles to the current messy situation on the mistaken assumption that a state need only stop interfering without rectifying or adjusting for its previous interferences. The relevant parts of various open-border texts are then criticised in light of this and for other errors, in particular for overlooking the likely huge scale of immigration as indicated by Gallup surveys. Additional criticisms are addressed in footnotes throughout. The conclusion outlines three broad options on immigration and suggests that directionally-libertarian policies are both more libertarian and practical than having states open their borders. The readers that might be interested in this subject matter include those engaging in libertarian philosophy, economics, and political theory.

Keywords


libertarianism; immigration policy; philosophy; private property; open borders; directionalism; thought-experiment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Block, W. E. (1998). “A Libertarian Case for Free Immigration”, Journal of Libertarian Studies 13:2: 167–186.

Block, W. & Callahan, G. (2003). “Is There a Right to Immigration?: A Libertarian Perspective”, Human Rights Review, October-December 2003: 46-71.

Caplan, B. (2012). “Why Should We Restrict Immigration?” Cato Journal, 32:1: 5-24.

Caplan, B. (2014). “The Swamping that Wasn't: The Diaspora Dynamics of the Puerto Rican Open Borders Experiment”, The Library of Economics and Liberty, accessed 15th Dec. 2020: https://www.econlib.org/archives/2014/03/the_swamping_th.html.

Clifton, J. (2012). “150 Million Adults Worldwide Would Migrate to the U.S.”, Gallup.com. https://news.gallup.com/poll/153992/150-Million-Adults-Worldwide-Migrate.aspx

Esipova, N. Pugliese, A. & Ray, J. (2018). “More Than 750 Million Worldwide Would Migrate If They Could” Gallup website, accessed 2nd Dec. 2020: https://news.gallup.com/poll/245255/750-million-worldwide-migrate.aspx?g_source=link_NEWSV9&g_medium=NEWSFEED&g_campaign=item_&g_content=More%2520Than%2520750%2520Million%2520Worldwide%2520Would%2520Migrate%2520If%2520They%2520Could

Gregory, A. & Block, W. E. (2007). “On Immigration: Reply to Hoppe,” Journal of Libertarian Studies, 21: 3: 25–42.

Heumer, M. (2010). “Is There a Right to Immigrate?”, Social Theory and Practice, 36:3: 429-61

Lester, J. C. ([2000] 2012). Escape from Leviathan: Libertarianism Without Justificationism. Buckingham: The University of Buckingham Press.

Lester, J. C. ([2011] 2016). Arguments for Liberty: a Libertarian Miscellany. Buckingham: The University of Buckingham Press.

Lester, J. C. (2014). Explaining Libertarianism: Some Philosophical Arguments. Buckingham: The University of Buckingham Press.

Lester, J. C. (2021). “Eleutherological-Conjecturalist Libertarianism: a Concise Philosophical Explanation”, PhilPapers: https://philpapers.org/rec/INDNLA.

McCarthy, N. (2018). “Nearly 160 Million People Want To Move To The U.S.” Gallup website, accessed 2nd Dec. 2020: https://www.statista.com/chart/10146/150-million-people-would-move-to-the-us-if-they-could/.

Migration Watch UK (2019). “Evidential basis for MWUK’s ‘30 Million’ claim”, accessed 4th Dec. 2020: https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/briefing-paper/464/evidential-basis-for-mwuks-30-million-claim.

Miller, D. W. (1994). Critical Rationalism: A Restatement and Defence. Chicago and La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.

Popper, K. R. ([1963] 1978). Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.