GEOPOLITICAL RISK AND ASEAN-5 STOCK MARKET DYNAMICS: VOLATILITY, CORRELATION, AND PREDICTIVE TRANSMISSION
Abstract
This study examines how geopolitical risk affects the stock markets of the five founding members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Singapore) from 2014 to 2025. Employing dynamic conditional correlation volatility models, causality tests, and structural break analyses, the research investigates market dynamics. Results indicate that negative shocks significantly amplify volatility, increasing it by up to 7.4 times in Thailand. Furthermore, the analysis shows moderate financial integration among the four emerging markets, with correlations ranging from 0.246 to 0.350. Singapore exhibits near-zero regional correlations, consistent with its role as an international financial hub, though the mechanisms underlying this pattern warrant further investigation. Evidence also suggests Malaysia displays notably heightened sensitivity to geopolitical risk predictions relative to its regional peers. Notably, no statistically significant structural breaks were detected during the eleven-year period, suggesting these markets absorbed disruptions without permanent regime shifts, subject to the inherent limitations of the structural break procedure employed. The paper recommends that portfolio managers, risk practitioners, and policymakers consider Singapore for within-region portfolio diversification, apply dedicated risk frameworks for Malaysia, and use full-sample estimates as a baseline for regulatory stress-testing across these economies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Antonakakis, N., Gabauer, D., Gupta, R., & Plakandaras, V. (2018). Dynamic connectedness of uncertainty across developed economies: A time-varying approach. Economics Letters, 166, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.02.011
Banerjee, A. K., Sensoy, A., & Goodell, J. W. (2024). Volatility connectedness between geopolitical risk and financial markets: Insights from pandemic and military crisis periods. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96(Part C), 103740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103740
Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
Bouri, E., Demirer, R., Gupta, R., & Marfatia, H. A. (2018). Geopolitical risks and movements in Islamic bond and equity markets: A note. Defence and Peace Economics, 30(3), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2018.1424613
Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2022). Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1194–1225. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191823
Chatziantoniou, I., Gabauer, D., & Stenfors, A. (2021). Interest rate swaps and the transmission mechanism of monetary policy: A quantile connectedness approach. Economics Letters, 204, 109891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109891
Elsayed, A. H., & Helmi, M. H. (2021). Volatility transmission and spillover dynamics across financial markets: The role of geopolitical risk. Annals of Operations Research, 305, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04081-5
Enescu, A.-G., & Răileanu Szeles, M. (2026). Geopolitical risks and global stock market dynamics: A quantile-based approach. International Journal of Financial Studies, 14(4), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs14040085
Engle, R. F. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(3), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102288618487
Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1779–1801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x
Huynh, T. T., & Khoa, B. T. (2026). Geopolitical risk and stock returns: Evidence from an emerging market. South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/22779787251413868
Kannadhasan, M., & Das, D. (2020). Do Asian emerging stock markets react to international economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk alike? A quantile regression approach. Finance Research Letters, 34, 101276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.08.024
Marangoz, C., Gerekan, B., Yılmaz, E., & Bulut, E. (2025). Disentangling geopolitical risks: A quantile approach to geopolitical risk indices' impacts on stock markets. Finance Research Letters, 77, 107113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107113
Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938260
Nguyen, N. D., Phung, D. N., & Huynh, T. T. (2026). The impact of geopolitical risk on stock market volatility and returns: Evidence from Southeast Asia. International Journal of Analysis and Applications, 24, 89. https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639-24-2026-89
Phan, D. H. B., Tran, V. T., & Iyke, B. N. (2022). Geopolitical risk and bank stability. Finance Research Letters, 46(Part B), 102453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102453
Salisu, A. A., Ogbonna, A. E., Lasisi, L., & Olaniran, A. (2022). Geopolitical risk and stock market volatility in emerging markets: A GARCH-MIDAS approach. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 62, 101755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101755
Yang, M., Zhang, Q., Yi, A., & Peng, P. (2021). Geopolitical risk and stock market volatility in emerging economies: Evidence from GARCH-MIDAS model. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1159358
Zheng, J., Wen, B., Jiang, Y., Wang, X., & Shen, Y. (2023). Risk spillovers across geopolitical risk and global financial markets. Energy Economics, 127(Part A), 107051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107051
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12709/mest.14.14.02.04
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

