INTEGRATION OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND PRODUCTION IN SYNERGETIC PARADIGM OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
Abstract
The article aim is to justify national priorities of integration processes activation in science, education and production that is important to consider in the synergetic paradigm of public management in Ukraine at the current stage of new challenges of globalization and the need to stabilize the economic development on innovative principles in the context of competitiveness. Integration is considered from the standpoint of a specific type of organizing the social interaction forms of modern spheres of science, education, production and adapting business entities to innovations in the context of qualitatively new joint structures, modernizing partnerships relations, effective functioning of which is accompanied by a synergetic effect. Based on the Global Competitiveness Index of the World Economic Forum integration of science, education and production in Ukraine in the international dimension is analyzed. There are determined the negative factors that impede the positive development of the national integration processes in Ukraine. The basic modern challenges and preconditions of deepening scientific, educational and productive interaction in Ukraine are formulated. It is proved the objective necessity of using a synergetic approach to strategic public management in modern conditions of openness and non-linearity of the Ukrainian national economy development, irreversibility of institutional changes and macroeconomic instability. The authors have developed the system of public management of balancing human and technological development of Ukraine, innovative tools of which are based on traditional methods of justifying the strategic program-targeted direction priorities.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amosha, O.I., Vishnevskiy, V.P., & Zbarazska, L.A. (2012). Neoindustrialization and new industrial policy of Ukraine [Neoindustrializatsia i novaja promyshlennaja politika Ukrainy]. Economy of Insutry [Ekonomika promyshlennosti], Vol. 57-58, No. 1-2, Pp. 3-32.
Bavykhin, G.A. (2003). Management of education development: organizational and economical aspect [Upravlenie razvitiem obrazovania: organizatsionno-ekonomicheskij aspect]. Moscow, Ekonomika. 428 p.
Bazhal, I. (2009) Technological Determinism of the Knowledge Economy Building in Transitive Countries. KSI Transactions on Knowledge Society. A publication of the Knowledge Society Institute.Vol. II, No.3, Pp. 13-16.
Bulanova-Toporkova M.V. (Ed.). (2002). Pedagogy and psychology of high school: Textbook. Rostov-na-Donu, Fenix, 544 p.
Grodskyj, S.V. (2012). European scoreboard of the innovative development and Ukraine [Evropejske tablo innovatsijnogo rozvytku ta Ukraina] // Innovative economy, No.12, Pp. 28-31.
Chiswrok, B.R. (1974). Income inequality: Regional analysis within a human capital Framework. N.Y. XVI. P. 30.
Denison, E.F. (1967). Why Growth Rates Differ: Post-War Experience in Nine Western Countries. Brookings Institute, Washington D.C. 494 p.
Fedulova, L.I. (2009). Knowledge economy [Ekonomika znan]: handbook [for students of HEE]. NAS of Ukraine; Insitute for economics and forecasting of NAS of Ukraine. Кyiv, PPC “Ekvpres“, 600 p.
Fey, C., & Birkinshaw, J.M. (2005). External knowledge sourcing, governance mode, and R&D performance. Journal of Management, 31(4), Pp. 597-613.
Heyets, V.M., & Semynozhenko, V.P. (2006). Innovative perspectives of Ukraine [Innovatsijni perspektyvy Ukrainy]. Kharkiv, Konstanta, 272 p.
Ivanov, V.N., Ivanov, A.V., & Doronin A.O. (2002). Management paradigm of the XXI century [Upravlencheskaja paradigma XXI veka]: training guide for HEE. Tom 1. Moscow, MSIM, 180 p.
Kostyuk, S.G. (2011). On integration of the educational process at the university and innovative activity [Ob integratsii obrazovatelnogo protsessa v vuze i innovatsionnoj dejatelnosti]. [In:] Innovative processes and corporate management [Innovatsionnyje protsessy i korporativnoje upravlenie]: Collection of articles of the III International distance scientific and pratical conference; V.V. Apanasovich (ed.). BGU, Institute of business and management of technologies, Minsk, National Library of Belarus, Part 1, 312 p., Pp. 252-256.
Mudraya, O.V. (2010). Analysis of the domestic practice of interaction between science, education and business [Analiz otechestvennoj praktiki vzaimodejstvia nauki, obrazovania i biznesa]. [In:] Mechanisms of managing the socio-economic systems development [Mekhanizmy upravlinnia rozvytkom sotsialno-ekonomichnykh system]: monograph; O.V. Martiakova (ed.). Donetsk, SHEE “DonNTU”, 688 p.
OECD. (1996). Lifelong Learning for All. Paris: OECD.
Ravinskij, R.V. (2006). Synergetics and development processes of complex systems [Sinergetika i protsesy razvitia slozhnykh system]. Issues of Philosophy [Voprosy filosofii], No. 2, Pp. 162-169.
Roco, M.C., & Bainbridge, W.S. (2013). The new world of discovery, invention, and innovation: convergence of knowledge, technology, and society. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, No.15.9, Pp. 1-17.
Shultz, T. (1960). Capital Formation by Education // Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 68.
Twiss, B. (1980). Managing Technological Innovation, 2nd ed. London, Longman.
World Economic Forum. (2015, December 12). The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2010-11.pdf
World Economic Forum. (2015, December 12). The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GCR_Report_2011-12.pdf
World Economic Forum. (2015, December 12). The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2012-13.pdf
World Economic Forum. (2015, December 12). The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2013-14.pdf
World Economic Forum. (2015, December 12). The Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2014-15.pdf
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.