THEORETICAL ANALYSIS AND POSITIONING BENCHMARKING AS A PRODUCT QUALITY MEASURING INSTRUMENTS
Daniela Todorova, Nina Gergova, Maria Christova, Petar Kolev
Abstract
The European Higher Education Area - EHEA is established on the principles and values, indicated in the Bologna declaration from 1999. During the annual conferences of ministers of higher education at countries from EHEA in the next years (Prague, Bergen, London, Leuven, Budapest, and Bucharest) these principles and values are developed and approved. One of these values is the quality of education. The highly compatible educational environment could provide such quality of education through which students acquire knowledge, skills, and competencies, necessary for the labor market. The aforementioned defines the relevance of the scientific problems addressed to the quality of higher education. The problem for quality has many aspects. One of them is at most significant: the quality of education science. It has to solve many tasks, addressed to the quality concept, quality measurement; choice of quality criteria and indicators (according to methods of mathematical taxonomy, multi-factor and cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling), quality verification and etc. Today, the dynamic development of the IT sector and the social trend raise new problems for higher education. Higher schools are related to both the market where quality educational services are provided and the labor market. The students are the consumers of educational services, while employers are the main consumers in the labor market. With the benchmarking approach, higher schools can define clear objectives for their development, based on the information about the advantages and disadvantages of education. The main objective of the present report is to be defined and evaluated the key indicators for quality measurement and management of education at higher schools by means of benchmarking model and to be defined the competitiveness of the European educational market.
Keywords
benchmarking, higher education, higher schools, quality, competitiveness
References
Danchev, P., Bassett, R. M., & Salmi, J. (2012, Sep. 01). Strengthening higher education in Bulgaria: options for improving the models of governance, quality assurance and financing of higher education. Retrieved from The World Bank: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/694441468006586259/Final-report
EC. (2015). Strategy for Development of Higher Education in the Republic of Bulgaria for the 2014-2020 period. Retrieved from Research & Innovation: https://rio.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/library/strategy-development-higher-education-republic-bulgaria-2014-2020-period
Hristov, H., & Hristova, M. (2016). National policy on quality of higher education – critical analysis and opportunities for improvement of the university management. BAN(1).
Lambovska, M. (2013). Application of a Model for Control on Teams at the University Of Transport “Todor Kableshkov”. Academic journal, Mechanics, Transport, Communications(2), 0-1 - 0-11.
Plevnaliev, R. (2012). Bulgaria 2020: National priorities in education and science. Nauka(6), 11. Retrieved from President of the Republic of Bulgaria.
Todorova, D., & Gergova, N. (2016). Possibilities To Apply Benchmarking As An Instrument For Product Quality Measurement. 21. Medzinarodna vedecka konferencia Crises situations solution in a specific environment (pp. 650-656). Zilina: FSI.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.