INNOVATIVE MECHANISMS OF REGULATION OF INTERREGIONAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASYMMETRY IN UKRAINE

Nadiya Danko-Yutish

Abstract


In the article there are analyzed the need for development and implementation of innovation-oriented regional development policy, and development of new innovative instruments of regional development that would be effective in terms of Ukraine's transition to a market economic system, as well as the essence of innovation potential and its place in the structure of the social and economic potential. The article shows the number of scientific theories that explain the dynamics of regional development and, consequently, causes asymmetries that are formed between regions. Here are also analyzed more innovative theories of regional development, the list of specific mechanisms for innovative regional policy, and especially their impact on overcoming inter-regional socio-economic asymmetry in Ukraine.

Keywords


socio-economic asymmetry, innovative potential, innovative model of regional development, regional innovation systems, clusters, “learning region”, innovative growth poles, venture capital investments, Spin-off Company

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. (2004). Understanding regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson, The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Asheim, B., Isaksen, A., Nauwelaers, C., & Todtling, F. (2003). Regional Innovation Policy for Small-Medium Enterprises. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Gerasimov, A. (2011a). Vzaimosvyaz' urovnya innovatsionnoy aktivnosti i konkurentosposobnosti regional'noy ekonomiki. Finansovaya ekonomika(3-4), 107-110.

Gerasimov, A. (2011b). K voprosu o formirovanii innovatsionnogo potentsiala regiona. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo(6).

Henderson, D. R. (2001, October 12). What the Nobel Economists Missed. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB1002844871126597040

Luk’yanenko, D. G., Poruchnik, A. M., & Stolyarchuk, Y. M. (2008). Globalna ekonomIka XXI st.: lyudskiy vimir. Kiev: KNEU.

Maillat, D. (1998). From the industrial district to the innovative milieux: contribution to an analysis of territorialized productive organizations. Working Paper 9606b, 28. University de Neuchetel. Retrieved 08 25, 2014, from http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/ctllouvre/1998017.htm

Maillat, D., & Grosjean, N. (1999). Globalization and territorial production systems. In D. Maillat, & N. Grosjean, Innovation, Networks and Localities (pp. 50-65). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58524-1_4

Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (1996). Slow convergence? Post-neoclassical Endogenous Growth Theory and Regional Development. Working Paper 44. Cambridge: ERSC Center for Business Research. University of Cambridge.

Perroux, F. (1995). Economic space: theory and applications. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64, 89–104.

Pilipenko, I. V. (2005). Konkurentosposobnost stran i regionov v mirovom hozyaystve: teoriya i opyit malyih stran. Smolensk: Oykumena.

Piore, M. S. (1984). The second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.

Setterfield, М. (2002). A model of Kaldorian traverse: cumulative causation, structural change and evolutionary hysteresis. In М.

Setterfield, The Economics of Demand-Led Growth (p. 320). Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781843765325

Shiltsin, Y. A. (2013). Voprosy otsenki regional'noy asimmetrii (na primere Rossii). In V. Y. Seliverstov (Ed.), Aktual'nyye problemy sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: vzglyad uchonykh: sb. nauchnykh trudov (pp. 143-158). Novosibirsk: IEOPP SO RAN. Retrieved from http://econom.nsc.ru/ieie/smu/conference/articles/ШильцинЕ.doc

Sokolenko, S. I. (2004). Klasteri v globalniy ekonomitsi. Kiev: Logos.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.